Public Health – Page 3 – Population Matters-USA

Different types of Female Genital Mutilation

I have often heard that the need to reduce population growth in African countries is less important than in rich countries because consumption is so much lower in Africa. It is true that the impact of a person in Africa is much less than someone in a rich country, however there are important but different reasons for Africans to reduce their fertility.

Although the average footprint of a person in Africa is small, there are already more feet than the land can bear in some places. Slowing population growth there will help people be healthier, happier and more productive. Traditions exist that are harmful to women and also lead to high fertility. These injurious traditions may have had their function in the past, but they have no place in the 21^st century.

In the past I was a cultural relativist. I believed that the practices in other cultures shouldn’t be evaluated by our standards. When I learned about Female Genital Mutilation, I changed my mind. If one believes that girls and women deserve the same respect as boys and men, one cannot be a cultural relativist.

FMG is practiced by many cultures in Africa. It consists of removing part or most of the external genitalia of girls. It is usually done without anesthesia and often with a dirty blade.When the margins of the vulva are separated by the (brutal) slicing, acacia needles are used to hold them together. Think of the agony FMG survivors suffer! Some victims die from blood loss or infection. The pain returns during intercourse and childbirth if the vaginal opening has been sewn nearly shut. Fortunately, there are many organizations in Africa that are working to get rid of FMG. Often they substitute another, more benign, coming-of-age ritual for girls.

Child marriage is another damaging custom of some African cultures. Typically, the girl’s arranged marriage is shortly after she starts to menstruate, and she is forced to wed a man many years older than she. A girlchild is considered a burden in many societies, so the best way to get unburdened is to marry her off. Worse, rape of a young girl is not uncommon. Since virginity is a requirement for marriage in many societies, the girl’s parents force their daughter to marry her rapist. The pitiable girl is thus dominated by her husband for the rest of her life.

The psychological effects on a girl who is married as a young teen must be terrible, however the physical effects can be fatal. Her pelvis may be too small to give birth if she conceives before her bones have finished growing. Obstructed labor may kill the fetus—resulting in a stillbirth. Sometimes pressure of the fetal head against the girl’s pelvis blocks blood flow to the girl’s tissues. The dead flesh dissolves, forming a hole through which pee and/or poop can pour.

You might think that child marriage and FGM don’t exist in the USA, but that is wrong. Some immigrants practice both. In addition, some non-immigrant groups have allowed early marriage, often in response to early teen pregnancies. Delaware was our first state to ban marriage before age 18, only 4 years ago. Women who marry young tend to have more children and seldom advance far in education.

Both child marriage and FGM are means of subjugating women; so is cutting short their education. Another way power is taken away from women is the absence of something we take for granted—clean and safe toilet facilities at schools. Many girls quit school after their period starts because their school lacks adequate, private toilet facilities.

Where girls and women are treated as inferior, they have little control over their lives. They don’t have power over what happens to the most personal parts of their bodies, nor when or whom they marry. They may not say when they have sex, nor limit the number of children they bear, nor use contraception if they want to.

Many organizations work to empower African women by putting an end to child marriage and FGM. One favorite is the Population Media Center, which has made great advances in education about these evils.

Although I am not an anthropologist and have spent only a little time in Africa, these seem to be some reasons that the population is growing so rapidly there. In the future I’ll write about religions which encourage large families, and about overpopulation causing famine—one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

Last month I wrote about the 5 countries I have enjoyed visiting in Africa, including citing their amazingly low per capita GDP. Although most of the population growth over the next decades is predicted to occur on that continent, I see some rays of hope.

There are two places in the world where studies have been done on ways to increase voluntary family planning, along with other important medical research. One is Matlab, Bangladesh and the other is Navrongo, northern Ghana. I had never heard of the Navrongo studies until shortly before visiting there!

Both Matlab and Navrongo have shown that community health workers can improve health significantly. In addition to family planning, the Ghanaian studies studied several successful interventions, including vitamin supplementation and mosquito nets treated with an insect repellant. Their family planning research showed that it is possible to increase contraceptive use and slow population growth even in an impoverished, poorly educated population. This is especially important research since Navrongo is close to the Sahel, and the people there are similar to Sahelians in their preference for large families.

In 1995, the beginning of the Navrongo studies, the average woman had about 5 children. Fifteen years later, in 2010, that number had dropped to a bit over 4, both in the Navrongo control group and in the country as a whole. One of the interventions decreased the fertility further, to 3.7; a significant reduction. Now, a decade later, the fertility rate for the whole country is 3.7 children per woman. That group was ten years ahead of the rest of the country! This group combined specially trained community health nurses (as opposed to stationing them at a clinic or hospital) and “zurugelu”.

“Zurugelu” means “togetherness for the common good”, and was male-centered in the past. For a better explanation, I asked one of the investigators who had worked in Navrongo what “zurugelu” meant. Here is Dr. James Phillips’ reply:

“The zurugelu approach is a social engagement strategy that involves merging the organizational system of primary health care provision with the traditional system of social organization and governance. When gender problems were evident, we attempted to turn patriarchy on end by working with women’s social groups in ways that were traditionally dominated by men. Social events, termed “durbars”, were traditionally male events that were led by traditional male social leaders. To build women’s autonomy and roles, we worked with leaders to eventually have women’s convened and women’s led durbars. We also had gender outreach activities for responding to the needs of women. As such, the “zurugelu” approach was a gender development strategy.”

(A “durbar” is a meeting of men with their chiefs.)

It is interesting that neither community health nurses nor zurugelu alone had much effect on fertility. Even though the nurses educated women about family planning and supplied the necessary materials, fertility did not decrease significantly in the regions where they were introduced but didn’t have zurugelu. Nor did zurugelu alone have much effect by itself. It took both working together for the fertility to come down.

The need for both nurses and zurugelu is a very important observation. The statement has been made frequently that worldwide over 200 million women want to limit their fertility but don’t have access to modern contraception. Since the nurses provided that access, we know that access alone isn’t enough—at least in this group of people. Apparently tradition and paternalism were significant barriers to using contraception. It took zurugelu to change attitudes before people made the most of what family planning was available.

What difference did zurugelu make? This traditionally male function opened the eyes of men to the needs of women. Furthermore, the Navrongo programs strengthen the roles of women.

Now, back to my visit in Ghana. It was dusk as we were driving from Navrongo back to Nalerigu. We passed a straw hut with smoke emerging from its roof.

“Is it on fire?” I asked.

“No”, my host replied. “She’s just cooking the evening meal.”

Although there is much beauty in northern Ghana, and everyone I met was friendly and warm, my impression is that life is difficult. Now that child mortality is a fourth of what it was 50 years ago, people will benefit from smaller families as well as more education.