Categories
Population

Margaret Sanger was not the First

            Although she is often given credit for being the earliest to broadcast family planning in the USA, Margaret Sanger was not the first. However, perhaps she was the bravest since she was arrested eight times while trying to help women.

            You may remember Sanger as the woman who started family planning clinics in New York; she spent time in jail for this audacious act. She persisted despite adversity, with the end result of a series of clinics that were the start of Planned Parenthood. Currently there are over 600 Planned Parenthood clinics in the USA. Her family planning work was greeted internationally as well as in the USA, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation providing reproductive health service in more than 145 countries.

            Trained as a nurse, Sanger worked in a clinic for poor women in New York City early in the 20th century. She realized that having children too close together was bad for the mothers’ health—and also for the children. Growing up with 10 siblings probably interested her in family planning!

            Unfortunately, Sanger got on the eugenics bandwagon, which was common in that era. Her name is somewhat besmirched because of that. It is very concerning that we seem to be experiencing a rebirth of eugenics in the USA, with discontinuation of programs to help poorer people and those among us with disabilities.

            There were at least two male physicians who helped pave the way for Sanger. Dr. Robert Dale Owen wrote “Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population Question”, (1831). He wrote: “Is it in itself desirable, that man should obtain control over the instinct of reproduction, so as to determine when its gratification shall produce offspring, and when it shall not?” He suggested using withdrawal to limit family size and suggested that a tubal ligation could be done at the time of a (then, very rare) Cesarean section.

            Owen also espoused an electrical devise to control fertility: “…considerable opportunity has been afforded by the sale of the Electro-Galvania alluded to in this work, for testing its efficacy as a preventive of conception.” The primary message of his book is furthering the message of Malthus—that overpopulation would bring on famine. He also advocated celibacy until “a late age”.

             Dr. Charles Knowlton’s “Fruits of Philosophy: The private companion of young married people” (pictured above) appeared a year later, in 1832. Again, his primary message is a concern about overpopulation, but he gave more information about family planning. Knowlton recommended the rhythm method, or douching shortly after intercourse to prevent pregnancy.

            The book described another means of birth control. The woman should insert a small, moistened piece of sponge in her vagina before intercourse. A thin ribbon attached to the sponge would aid its removal. This method is similar to what Francis Place, a British activist advocated in a pamphlet published 10 years earlier, and was commonly used by the upper classes.

            Both of these books argue that family planning was not immoral. Unfortunately, Knowlton, a citizen of Massachusetts, spent 3 months in prison on obscenity charges. Apparently, the officials didn’t agree with his views on morality.

            Forty years later, strict laws were enacted to prevent the mailing of obscene or abortion-related matter—the Comstock Act. Most of those laws have been overthrown, except for the part about mailing abortion information. Although it is now possible to mail information about family planning or get birth control pills by mail, now anti-choice forces in the USA are considering using this archaic Act to prevent prescription of medication abortion by telemedicine.

©Richard Grossman MD, 2025

Categories
Abortion Administrative Family Planning Infertility Sterilization

Is Durango a Reproductive Health Desert?

            Well, the answer to the title’s question is “yes, no and maybe”.

            First, I should define a “reproductive health desert”. It is an area without a provider of reproductive health. Thus, there are maternity, fertility, contraceptive and abortion deserts.

            Cortez (Montezuma County) was a maternity desert for a brief period of time. The hospital’s administration closed down their birthing center. Outrage from the community pressured the management to open it up again.

            There were a few years that we had sophisticated infertility services in Durango. Unfortunately, the two doctors who provided this care are gone. The OB-GYN doctors who remain can help couples with most fertility issues, but some folks will need to go to Albuquerque or elsewhere for more complex infertility problems.

            There shouldn’t be a real shortage of effective contraception anywhere in the US now that OPill® is available to anyone with a uterus. Or without—I got a package of this over-the-counter birth control pill for an art project from Amazon. They didn’t quibble over my gender.

            (More about Opill®: It is a birth control pill that is available without a prescription. The only contraindications are pregnancy or a history of breast cancer. It needs to be taken every day at the same time.)

            However, there are women who don’t want to use hormones or aren’t regular in taking pills or cannot afford $20 a month. They may live in a county without a clinic that provides the full range of family planning methods—this is how “contraceptive desert” may be defined, and almost 20 million women live in counties that lack this care.

            La Plata County is far from a contraceptive desert. Even though Planned Parenthood is closed, the health department (in the beautiful AXIS Health System building), many physicians, and midlevel providers are happy to prescribe desired methods.

            Unfortunately, we do live in an abortion desert now that PP is closed. PP clinics in neighboring Cortez and Farmington do provide medication abortion care, however they are limited to 11 weeks gestational age. Regrettably, procedural abortions (those done in the clinic) are not available in the Four Corners area at this time.

            While on the subject of abortion, I just read a reason that the religious right has chosen to fight against this important part of healthcare. It was written by a Methodist pastor, David Barnhart.

‘“The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn….

‘It’s almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

‘Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.”

            A small group of concerned people are working to bring back both medical and procedural abortion services to Durango, but it may take months.