Stick to Humor, Dr. Black
â€œâ€¦the first essential component of social justice is adequate food for all mankind.â€
Norman Borlaug, in his 1970 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I used to love to listen to Baxter Black on the radio. I admired his sense of humor and his human insight. Then I read an article he wrote.
â€œWhat is sustainable ag?â€ appeared in the March, 2013 issue of Western Farmer-Stockman. I am writing this as a response to my friend Al, who clipped the article for me. Al is a wise man and an experienced farmer. He wrote: â€œI thought this was a good article on sustainable agriculture. I hope you find it interesting.â€
Indeed, it is interestingâ€”not for what it contains, but for what Dr. Black left out. First, let me summarize the article.
Dr. Black writes that that most agriculturalists think that â€œsustainable farmingâ€ is a joke, and derides those who want to return to pre1950 farming methods. He makes fun of â€œhobby farmersâ€ who have a garden and a few animals since they donâ€™t produce enough food to feed their families for even two weeks.
Black then rightly recaps the history after World War II, when world population soared and people worried about food shortages. Megacorporations and scientists were able to increase food production remarkably, despite the creep of cities taking over productive ag land. He doesnâ€™t mention the â€œgreen revolutionâ€ of Dr. Norman Borlaug and others, which is credited with saving over a billion lives by developing highly productive strains of crops.
This modern, industrial model of agriculture is sustainable according to Black, because it can sustain so many people. Great grandpaâ€™s old-fashioned ways of producing food are laughable in todayâ€™s context, he writes. He would prefer the term â€œsubsistence-level farmingâ€.
Although I understand Alâ€™s and Blackâ€™s viewpoint, I cannot agree. My concern is that, along with its good, the â€œgreen revolutionâ€ has had several dreadful unintended consequences.
Growing highly productive plants and animals requires the use of many chemicals that are made from limited resources, and are toxic. The chemicals include fertilizers, insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. They are all derived from fossil fuels, and all transported with fossil fuel. Unfortunately, supplies of carbon-based fuels are limited. We have probably already maximized the production of petroleum and soon will see its declineâ€”and a rapid increase in prices.
We are starting to realize the subtle toxicity of many of the agricultural chemicals. The wonder insecticide of my childhood, DDT (which I was told was entirely safe) turned out to be an ecological disaster and now is banned in many countries. An amazing group of insecticides, neonicatinoids, is probably responsible for the die-off of our honeybeesâ€”colony collapse disorder. Since bees pollinate so many crops, this is an agricultural disaster.
We now realize that many agricultural chemicals have endocrine effects, even in minuscule concentrations. Just a pinch in all the water in an Olympic swimming pool can cause harm! Insecticide residues may decrease sperm counts. One common agrichemical, atrazine, has been shown to cause feminization of male frogs and has been implicated in reproductive cancers.
The seeds of highly productive plant strains must be bought from corporations that control their prices. In the past, seed grain was carefully preserved from the prior crop, but now farmers need cashâ€”or creditâ€”in order to buy seeds. This expense, along with the cost of the chemicals, has broken many farmers. In a good year they can make a living, but in a bad year their suicide rate climbs.
Finally, modern agriculture depletes our soil. The use of chemicals exhausts many components that help plants grow.
There is a subtle chicken-and-egg situation here. Modern agriculture has increased food supply, which allowed our population to swell. Borlaug outwitted Malthus, who predicted that human population would be limited by starvation from lack of food.
Here is the quandary: does modern agriculture only provide a short-term gain? As we deplete petroleum and as crop growing conditions worsen from climate change and drought, can the amazing technology of modern agriculture be sustained? Indeed, some scientists have a terrible vision of severe food shortages with bloodshed and more deaths than Borlaugâ€™s green revolution saved.
In his Nobel Prize speech quoted above, Borlaug also said: â€œâ€œMost people still fail to comprehend the magnitude and menace of the â€˜Population Monsterâ€™.â€ Hopefully Herald readers are better informed than most. But only time will tell if Dr. Black is correct about sustainable agriculture, or if he should go back to being a humorist.
Â© Richard Grossman MD, 2013