Categories
children Population

Pronatalism

British family with 21 children, and the mother pregnant

            Elon Musk has stated “…population collapse due to low birth rates is a much bigger risk to civilization than global warming.” Musk is doing his part to prevent collapse—he’s fathered 14 children with multiple women.

            Musk is concerned because people are having smaller families and that we’re living longer. Apparently, he worries that there will not be enough workforce to do all the labor that society needs to continue. My interpretation is that he fears that the supply of cheap labor will diminish.

            This is reminiscent of the mudsill theory. The “mudsill” is the lowest part of a building, and also refers to the lowest class of people in a society. It is the belief that there always has been, and must be, an underclass to work for the upper classes. This theory was developed by a South Carolina state senator in 1858 as an effort to justify slavery. I fear that Musk and many politicians live in a billionaire’s bubble, and that they believe that the rest of us are needed to support them. They are unaware of the importance of the natural world, let alone the needs and wishes of normal people.

            A new magazine for women, Evie, stresses classical femininity vs. feminism. Along with Evie you can get an app “28 Cycle, Period, Wellness” which women can use to predict ovulation—but shouldn’t. It is unreliable at predicting a woman’s fertile time, and should only be used with another contraceptive method. However, Evie’s originators also push “Birth Control Detox”, which contains several expensive herbs. They want you to fear hormonal birth control. I wonder how many subscribers to Evie who use “28” end up with unintended pregnancies.

            Much that women have to control their fertility is being taken away. There are many barriers now, including pressure to have more children. They distrust contraception (even though it’s much safer than childbearing). Furthermore, access to safe abortion care is absent in many states—and in La Plata County.

            Durango is not immune from these pressures. Planned Parenthood has closed the clinic where I worked for 40 years. A person can get telemedicine services elsewhere and receive the abortion medication by mail. For later or procedural abortions, the nearest clinic is a 4+ hour drive.

            In addition to performing abortions for unintended pregnancies, (including some that resulted from rape or incest), PP offered many other reproductive health services for women and men. These included: diagnosis and treatment of infections, prescribing birth control and cancer screening such as Pap smears. All these medical services were discounted in price or free, depending on a person’s ability to pay.

            I remember Claire, an older woman, whom I met at PP. She had had a Pap suspicious for cancer and thought she couldn’t pay for a private doctor. At my office I did a procedure at no charge that showed that she had an unusual type of cancer. She had radical surgery in Denver and was cured. Without her Pap at PP she would have died from the cancer.

            One of the best times for a woman to start birth control is in the hospital, after giving birth. In addition to placing an IUD postpartum, it is easy to do a tubal ligation after birth by cesarean, if that is what a woman wants. Both of these are not possible at Mercy Hospital because of the pronatalist Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.

            Although Colorado is a safe haven for abortion care, La Plata County doesn’t reflect that. In addition, there is increasing social pressure to have children. Perhaps the very worst is that politics, medical care and religion have gotten mixed up, as opposed to the spirit of our Constitution’s Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….” Incidentally, the Bill of Rights says nothing against the president establishing a religion.

©Richard Grossman MD, 2025

Categories
Population

FP2030

         Last month I wrote about the coalition of rich and poor countries, of foundations and nonprofits that delivered family planning to 46 million women—FP2020. Its successor, FP2030, has continued the same work, but with some changes.

            One of the involved nonprofits, the Margaret Pyke Trust (MPT), has introduced a new direction for FP2030. It has connected the growth of the human population with the decrease in biodiversity, and is doing something about it.

            Population, Health and Environment (PHE) programs are not new. The recent book “Walking with Gorillas” was written by the first wildlife veterinarian in Uganda, Dr. Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka. The growing human population threatens wildlife in at least two ways. People take over the habitat of the animals, and some human diseases, such as scabies, were passed to animals. Of course, wildlife also threaten people! As humans push into areas where the animals had lived, the animals sometimes attack humans or destroy their gardens. They also have introduced diseases to humans, such as Ebola.  Kalema-Zikusoka was so concerned about conflict between wildlife and humans that she started a PHE program which provides basic healthcare, contraception and environmental education, to the farmers.

            Several years ago, I wrote about a PHE program on the bank of the Amazon River. It had a small health clinic with educational programs. Their family planning program was unique. There are no roads in the area—all transportation is by boat. Because the clinic worked on a shoestring budget, a long-acting contraceptive method would be advantageous. Villagers couldn’t afford a trip to the clinic except for an emergency. The solution was to have a boat go up and down the river 4 times a year. A health worker gave DepoProvera shots (which last 3 months) to women who wanted birth control.

            The Margaret Pyke Trust is a British organization that specializes in education about reproductive health and contraception. Their new campaign, “Thriving Together”, started recently and already has over 150 organizations supporting it. Its goal is to build a movement recognizing “…that family planning is critically important not only women and girls, but also for the environment.” Furthermore, the head of MPT wrote: “…the existence of barriers to family planning is the most important ignored environmental challenge of our day.”

            I cannot agree more! I remember when two of the top environmental nonprofits in the USA (National Audubon Society and the Sierra Club) recognized the effect of overpopulation on the environment and had active population groups. Now, the Center for Biological Diversity is the only major organization with that recognition; there are 6 people on its Population and Sustainability Team.

            Although MPT will not provide clinical services as a part of FP2030, they will probably have a greater impact than if they did. Instead, they will be working with national governments to develop policies. Specifically, they plan to work with all the countries that have signed the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, which requires each state to have a biodiversity plan. MPT will offer their expertise with a new document “Reproductive choice in national biodiversity policy”.

            One of the goals of this MPT program is to increase reproductive choice knowledge for several thousand people working in the fields of biodiversity and climate. They have made this possible by joining a number of international organizations, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. They are the first and only group in these organizations with reproductive health expertise.

            To me, one of the best parts of the MPT is that they talk about “removing barriers to family planning”; they are careful to not pressure people into using contraception. Moreover, they are working to slow the extinction crisis.

©Richard Grossman, MD