Categories
Durango Herald Family Planning Population Public Health

Haunted in India

The image of Varanasi that stays with me is not the chanting and bell ringing while seven saffron-robed priests gesture with incense and flames. It is not the nine clouds of smoke as bodies are cremated on the steps beside the Mother Ganges. It is not the press of dense crowds of people-whom I found to be more comfortable than those in New York City. I am haunted by the lepers.

This is written on a long-awaited trip to India. My invitation came over 40 years ago with a chance meeting with a man from this country. I told him that I was going to medical school because of concern about overpopulation. He responded “Come to India, we need you.”

Varanasi is the heart of Hindu India. Pilgrims have visited there for centuries because of the cleansing water of the Ganges. Believers go there to die, since it is most auspicious to have your soul released by cremation beside this holy river. Perhaps you have seen images of this in glossy magazines. But the pictures leave out an important part of Varanasi.

India’s population more than quadrupled during the twentieth century. Yet during this same period the number of children a woman bears during her lifetime has halved, from 6 to 3. This seeming paradox occurred because of falling infant mortality. In the past, a huge proportion of children died before adulthood. Although medical care has helped, the most important factors for this welcome decline in childhood mortality have been improved nutrition and hygiene.

As a medical student I was curious about Hansen disease, as this scourge is now called. The bacterium that causes it lives in amazing harmony with human nerves, but gradually causes them to fail. Injuries are common because affected people cannot feel pain. Worse, at night rats nibble unprotected fingers and toes.

Cure of the infection is possible, but prolonged and expensive. Often treatment is limited to little more than bandaging and protection of the affected part. Tradition has forced people with Hansen disease to live separate from the rest of society. There is still a strong emotional reaction to the word “leper” even though most people in the USA have never seen one. Perhaps Hansen disease was the first use of quarantine, although the disease isn’t very contagious. What I didn’t learn in medical school is that it is very much a disease of poverty and malnutrition. As proof, well-nourished health workers seldom contract the disease even with constant exposure.

Leprosy still thrives in India because of poverty. Malnutrition is too common here, although less than a century ago. This month the India Times reported the sad results of a national health survey. Only a quarter of newborn babies are given the breast within an hour of birth. This lessens their chances of successful breastfeeding, which could substantially reduce infant mortality. Half of all children under 3 years are underweight, and one in five is stunted by lack of food. Three quarters are anemic, due to parasites or iron deficiency. Another article pointed out that girls are more likely to be starved than boys. In contrast, there are many rich people in India. One woman in seven is overweight. This is a country of contrasts.

To quantify this huge gulf between rich and poor, compare the income of the richest fifth of the world’s people with the poorest fifth. Worldwide this ratio in 1960 was 30 to one. Now it is more than 80 to one. The rich are getting richer-often at the expense of the poor.

Why should we care that this chasm is widening? There are two reasons. First is altruistic-it is sad to have people suffer from poverty. The other is that poverty threatens the security of rich people. Indeed, some feel that the real reason for terrorism against the USA is economic.

The image that sticks with me is of people lining our path to the Ganges. Squatting with quiet, upturned stolid faces, they held empty begging bowls with mutilated hands.

Part of my personal attempt to narrow the chasm between poor and rich has been to help support children in developing countries. For the first 35 years we sponsored a series of boys in Columbia. Filimina Mallik, our current child, lives in a remote part of India, too far from our tour. I believe that she is healthier and better educated for the small donation we make each month through Plan USA.

© Richard Grossman MD, 2007

[The article above may be copied or published but must remain intact, with attribution to the author. I also request that the words “First published in the Durango Herald” accompany any publication. For more information, please write the author at: richard@population-matters.org.]

Categories
Action Durango Herald Medical Population

Include Men

How can we influence more people to use modern contraception? The answer is simple—include male partners in making family planning decisions. This ploy works in many different cultures.
Why have men been left out of family planning? In the past, planners have focused on women since only they get pregnant. The family planning movement started with Margaret Sanger over 75 years ago. For many years clinics catered to women’s needs, and only recently have they started to provide reproductive health care for men. There is another reason, too. Men make millions of sperm, but women only make one egg a month. It is easier to stop the production of a single egg than of all those sperm.
Furthermore, demographic studies of fertility usually focus on women. This is because it is easier to trace the parentage of a child to the mother. For example, the total fertility rate is defined as the number of children per woman. Only recently have demographers studied the fathering of children.
Now we acknowledge the importance of men in family planning. Especially in “macho” societies where men tend to be the decision-makers, women don’t have much control over the use of contraception unless their husbands concur.
Worldwide there are successes when men are included in family planning decisions. One comes from Ethiopia. Community family planning workers visited two different groups of married couples at home. In one group only the wife was present. The husbands also were present with the other half of the couples. Few of these couples were already using modern contraception.
Did these visits make a difference? Yes! One or two visits increased the use of pills, IUD’s or condoms. Did the presence of the husband improve the acceptance of contraception? You bet it did! At the end of a year, a third of couples were still using a method if their husbands had participated in the contraceptive decision. Only half that many used family planning where the husband was excluded.
Here in the United States the story is similar. Education, along with the AIDS scare, has doubled teens’ use of condoms in the past decade. In the past men assumed that women would take full responsibility for contraception. Now guys are more likely to share this responsibility and to use condoms. The availability of clinics where men feel comfortable has helped catalyze this change. Whether they attend alone or with their partners, it is important to involve men.

When asked, most males believe that preventing pregnancy is partly a male responsibility. Sad to say, only 2% of federal family planning dollars are allocated to reproductive services for men. Fortunately, some programs succeed in reaching young men.
Male service providers have found several steps to build successful programs. They use mass media to reach young men and to encourage them to communicate with their partners. Then they provide information about condoms and vasectomy where men tend to gather—a favorite place is in barbershops.

Teens on Track (TNT) is a program sponsored by Planned Parenthood of Southern New Jersey. Their first step was to hire male clinic workers. Then they built a program that incorporates recreation, education and medical care. The local YMCA hosts “Teen Night”. An hour of education on male health and sexuality is followed by sports—swimming or basketball. Attendance has been excellent.
In Houston the Baylor Teen Health Clinic hired a sports medicine physician to help draw teens to their “Males Only” program. Outreach workers recruit young men from housing projects and juvenile probation centers. The programs have helped the guys stay in school, improve academic performance and prevent unplanned pregnancies.
In one of the poorest countries of Africa “…men are deliberately constructing their family sizes and structure.” Researchers conclude: “Our perception is that in the communities studied in the rural Gambia, men’s contribution to the costs of bearing and raising their children is smaller than that of their wives…. It may be that the key shift precipitating fertility transition in high fertility societies in West Africa will be the growing financial burden of fatherhood.” The Gambia has one of the highest growth rates in the world. We can only hope that the men sense this burden quickly and plan for smaller families.
It is possible to change attitudes. Including men in family planning decisions increases their use of male methods, and improves their cooperation with their partners’ use of contraception. The result is fewer unplanned pregnancies, and better communication between men and women.
© Richard Grossman MD, 2005